Ok, une cheerleader pas de tête !

C'est ce qu'elle a toujours été comme le disait Jeanezmarre. C'est le chaudron à Ti-Mine69 et les pros-Trump de Vidangia qui l'ont vantée avec le Kraken. Mais aujourd'hui, pas un mot sur cette nouvelle des jambons de Vidangia.

____________

Normal, sont tellement habitués de mettre de la marde que lorsque c'est une vraie nouvelle, ils sont bouches bées !

Tous des QI -120 !

Ok, une cheerleader pas de tête !

C'est ce qu'elle a toujours été comme le disait Jeanezmarre. C'est le chaudron à Ti-Mine69 et les pros-Trump de Vidangia qui l'ont vantée avec le Kraken. Mais aujourd'hui, pas un mot sur cette nouvelle des jambons de Vidangia.

____________

Normal, sont tellement habitués de mettre de la marde que lorsque c'est une vraie nouvelle, ils sont bouches bées !

Tous des QI -120 !

Ok, une cheerleader pas de tête !

C'est ce qu'elle a toujours été comme le disait Jeanezmarre. C'est le chaudron à Ti-Mine69 et les pros-Trump de Vidangia qui l'ont vantée avec le Kraken. Mais aujourd'hui, pas un mot sur cette nouvelle des jambons de Vidangia.

Une gang de tarlas qui se défendent en disant que les tarlas qui les ont crus sont... justement, des épais. Avec autant d'intelligence qu'un fond de puisard, vu qu'aucune personne raisonnable ne pourrait croire que les accusations de fraude électorale massive étaient véridique. Ti-Mine69 quoi se fait démolir par sa héroïne du Big Kraken.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/sidney-powell-argues-in-new-court-filing-th...

The election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems sued Powell for defamation after she pushed lawsuits and made appearances in conservative media on behalf of then-President Donald Trump to sow doubt about the 2020 election results. Dominion claims that Powell knew her election fraud accusations were false and hurtful to the company.

In a new court filing, Powell's attorneys write that she was sharing her "opinion" and that the public could reach "their own conclusions" about whether votes were changed by election machines.

"Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump," Powell's defense lawyers wrote in a court filing on Monday.

"Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims.' They are repeatedly labelled 'inherently improbable' and even 'impossible.' Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."

_______________

Une autre tête de pus. Comme Ti-Mine69 !

Elle va perdre et devra certainement dédommager la compagnie qu'elle a sali lors de ses sorties public pour défendre son gros clown orange...orange-autant !

A-t-elle fait une rétractation ou s'est-elle excusée publiquement ?

Non, elle a plutôt mit la faute sur les pros-Trumnp. Elle a dit que des gens raisonnables ne pouvaient croire ce qu'elle disait. Mais elle disait ne pas parler en son nom mais au nom de Trump et des pros-Trump. Donc des imbéciles pros-Trump.

Une gang de tarlas qui se défendent en disant que les tarlas qui les ont crus sont... justement, des épais. Avec autant d'intelligence qu'un fond de puisard, vu qu'aucune personne raisonnable ne pourrait croire que les accusations de fraude électorale massive étaient véridique. Ti-Mine69 quoi se fait démolir par sa héroïne du Big Kraken.

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/sidney-powell-argues-in-new-court-filing-th...

The election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems sued Powell for defamation after she pushed lawsuits and made appearances in conservative media on behalf of then-President Donald Trump to sow doubt about the 2020 election results. Dominion claims that Powell knew her election fraud accusations were false and hurtful to the company.

In a new court filing, Powell's attorneys write that she was sharing her "opinion" and that the public could reach "their own conclusions" about whether votes were changed by election machines.

"Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump," Powell's defense lawyers wrote in a court filing on Monday.

"Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims.' They are repeatedly labelled 'inherently improbable' and even 'impossible.' Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."

_______________

Une autre tête de pus. Comme Ti-Mine69 !

Elle va perdre et devra certainement dédommager la compagnie qu'elle a sali lors de ses sorties public pour défendre son gros clown orange...orange-autant !

A-t-elle fait une rétractation ou s'est-elle excusée publiquement ?

https://www.msn.com/en-ca/news/newspolitics/sidney-powell-argues-in-new-court-filing-th...

The election infrastructure company Dominion Voting Systems sued Powell for defamation after she pushed lawsuits and made appearances in conservative media on behalf of then-President Donald Trump to sow doubt about the 2020 election results. Dominion claims that Powell knew her election fraud accusations were false and hurtful to the company.

In a new court filing, Powell's attorneys write that she was sharing her "opinion" and that the public could reach "their own conclusions" about whether votes were changed by election machines.

"Given the highly charged and political context of the statements, it is clear that Powell was describing the facts on which she based the lawsuits she filed in support of President Trump," Powell's defense lawyers wrote in a court filing on Monday.

"Indeed, Plaintiffs themselves characterize the statements at issue as 'wild accusations' and 'outlandish claims.' They are repeatedly labelled 'inherently improbable' and even 'impossible.' Such characterizations of the allegedly defamatory statements further support Defendants' position that reasonable people would not accept such statements as fact but view them only as claims that await testing by the courts through the adversary process."